1) After watching the video, I really wanted to research more into how these new technologies influenced the art classroom, and what was going on particularly within my own content area at this time. Through the 1900's, education was reformed, and the content of art redefined. The concept of what art is is important to explore-- It is not only about traditional media, but also subjects like photography, music, and media.
I believe that visual instruction influenced education in my particular content area the most during this time period. I believe during this time that print was still a very important source in the art classroom:
By 1900, publishers had discovered the market for color art reproductions as well. With wire associations or press services furnishing the same news, editorials, and pictures to subscribing papers, by the turn of the century even rural readers were able to keep abreast of national events and public opinion ("The 1900s: The Arts: Overview." American Decades. 2001.Encyclopedia.com. (October 19, 2012)).
But besides what was taught in print, instructional film would benefit an art classroom-- historical dances, silent films, choreography, learning about new cultures and countries, watching a band play, artist interviews-- making art come to life within the classroom through the use of instructional films undoubtedly would influence the art classroom, if the idea was accepted and embraced.
2) I believe the use of film is still the greatest impact on schooling in my content area. I have a celebrant perspective on education and think that technology can do more good than harm. Even Thomas Edison believed that books would become obsolete to the motion picture. I do not think that print has become obsolete in any way and that for some students, it is more beneficial. But I believe that the use of film, tvs, and projectors in the classroom has helped art become more relatable. Though I still think it's important for students to learn traditional media like painting and drawing, there is so much more involved in the term "art."
In the article about Beulah Mae, I could understand why this technology would seem like a downside to education. During the time, most teachers seem frustrated with the use of film. Apparently, Beulah Mae found it to be a problem in her classroom. I believe that perhaps short-term, yes, that this instructional tool may have made formalized schooling in my content area worse, as it was a forced idea-- but overall, the positive, long-term effects outweigh the bad ones. Essentially, this technology was a new way of thinking and perceiving. I think that during the time, the stress on new technologies may have given teacher's a bad perspective on this new beneficial tool.